In follow up to the previous post, with its silly season theme, I’d like to draw attention to a timely piece that caught my eye on the BBC news magazine site. Michael Blastland (author, with Andrew Dilnot, of The Tiger That Isn't: Seeing Through a World of Numbers) gives some handy tips for seeing through the misreporting of research findings.
He cautions readers against taking such reports at face value, encouraging us to compare the claims made about research findings with the research methodology employed, to see if the two stack up.
In lesson one Blastland discusses some of the common flaws in reporting survey data. ‘The news’ he notes, ‘is chock full of surveys. Many are blatant self-promotion and/or statistical garbage’. He's perfectly right- we should be wary of such things, especially at this time of year when there is a surfeit of quack research in place of proper news stories.









